4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Flame-spray-pyrolysis amorphous alumina-silica for tailoring the product distribution of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 339, 期 -, 页码 40-47

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.01.048

关键词

Amorphous silica-alumina; Flame spray pyrolysis; Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; Liquid fuel; Product distribution; Ruthenium

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21636006]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201601005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solid acid in metal-acid bifunctional catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis plays a crucial role for one-step selective synthesis of liquid fuels such as gasoline or diesel. In this work, the amorphous silica-alumina (ASA) synthesized by a one-step flame spray pyrolysis method (FSP) was demonstrated for the first time as an efficient solid acid for regulating the product distribution of FT synthesis. The 3 wt.% Ru impregnated ASA with different Al/(Al + Si) ratios was comparatively investigated for FT synthesis under typical conditions. The materials were characterized by XRD, STEM, H-2-TPR, NH3-TPD, and N-2 adsorption/desorption at low temperatures. In comparison with the ASA synthesized by the traditional sol-gel method, the ASA prepared by the FSP method showed clearly increased acidity. As a result, the selectivity of C-13(+) hydrocarbons was decreased while the selectivity of C5-12 hydrocarbons was increased, the extent of which is clearly dependent on the Al/(Al + Si) ratio of ASA. Moreover, both the carbon-chain length and the composition of olefins, normal and branched alkanes of FT products were easily regulated in a certain extent by simply changing the Al/(Al + Si) ratio of ASA. Thus, the enhanced and easily regulated acidity, rich porous structure, and available large-scale production of the ASA originated from FSP method make it an important solid acid for selective synthesis of liquid fuels via FT route.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据