4.5 Article

Persistent restoration to the immunosupportive tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma by bevacizumab

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 110, 期 2, 页码 499-508

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.13889

关键词

bevacizumab; PD-1; PD-L1; TAM; Treg

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI) [16K20026]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K20026] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes the immunosuppressive microenvironment, the efficacy of bevacizumab (Bev) on tumor immunity has not been fully investigated. The present study used 47 glioblastoma tissues obtained at 3 different settings: tumors of initial resection (naive Bev group), tumors resected following Bev therapy (effective Bev group), and recurrent tumors after Bev therapy (refractory Bev group). The paired samples of the initial and post-Bev recurrent tumors from 9 patients were included. The expression of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD ligand-1 (PD-L1), CD3, CD8, Foxp3, and CD163 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The PD-L1+ tumor cells significantly decreased in the effective or refractory Bev group compared with the naive Bev group (P < .01 for each). The PD-1+ cells significantly decreased in the effective or refractory Bev group compared with the naive Bev group (P < .01 for each). The amount of CD3+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration increased in the refractory Bev group compared with the naive Bev group (CD3, P < .01; CD8, P = .06). Both Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages significantly decreased in the effective or refractory Bev group compared with the naive Bev group (Foxp3, P < .01 for each; CD163, P < .01 for each). These findings were largely confirmed by comparing paired initial and post-Bev recurrent tumors. Bevacizumab restores the immunosupportive tumor microenvironment in glioblastomas, and this effect persists during long-term Bev therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据