4.5 Article

Changes in Fatigue, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life After Chemotherapy in Women with Breast Cancer A Prospective Study

期刊

CANCER NURSING
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 E54-E60

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000689

关键词

Chemotherapy; Depression; Anxiety; Fatigue; Longitudinal study

资金

  1. Fund of the Sahmyook University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Chemotherapy leads to various symptoms and psychological distress, which contribute to a significant decrease in the quality of life of the patients. Objectives The aim of this study was to identify changes and interrelationships in the fatigue-depression-anxiety symptom cluster and quality of life during the cancer care trajectory in women with breast cancer. Methods Fifty women participated in the study and completed questionnaires at 3 different times: prechemotherapy, postchemotherapy, and 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy. The assessment tools were the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer version 4 Scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive and repeated-measures analysis of variance statistics. Results A significant increase in fatigue (F = 41.95, P < .001) and psychological distress (F = 26.55, P < .001) from prechemotherapy to postchemotherapy was noted. Improvement was observed 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy. A positive or negative change in fatigue was associated with the same in psychological distress. Quality of life (F = 65.22, P < .001) also showed similar change patterns as observed with fatigue and psychological distress. Fatigue had a greater impact on quality of life at postchemotherapy, but psychological distress had a greater impact at prechemotherapy and at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusion These results suggest that chemotherapy is highly associated with the fatigue-depression-anxiety symptom cluster and quality of life in women with breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据