4.4 Review

Deepening the Understanding of Thiolate-Protected Metal Clusters Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
卷 92, 期 3, 页码 664-695

出版社

CHEMICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.20180357

关键词

Metal clusters; High-performance liquid chromatography; High-resolution separation

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP16H04099, 16K21402, 16K17480]
  2. Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation
  3. Futaba Electronics Memorial Foundation
  4. Iwatani Naoji Foundation
  5. Ube Industries Foundation
  6. Asahi Glass Foundation
  7. [17H05385]
  8. [18H05178]
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K17480] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thiolate (SR)-protected metal clusters have been extensively studied by using various structural analysis methods since the start of research into these clusters. We have also studied these clusters based on common analysis methods used by many other research groups. However, we also have actively worked towards efficient application of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to study these clusters. Consequently, we have achieved high-resolution separations of several SR-protected gold and alloy clusters. By realizing such high-resolution separations, we have achieved a deeper understanding of a number of issues, including: 1) the transition size from bulk to non-bulk behavior in dodecanethiolate-protected gold clusters; 2) heteroatom substitution effects on the electronic structures and the dependence of isomer distributions on experimental conditions in hydrophobic SR-protected alloy clusters; 3) the mechanism of ligand-exchange reactions in hydrophobic metal clusters; and 4) the chemical composition of products in hydrophilic metal clusters. These results have clearly demonstrated that HPLC separation and analysis are extremely effective in helping to understand the fundamental properties of SR-protected metal clusters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据