4.6 Article

Response duration and survival shorten after each relapse in patients with follicular lymphoma treated in the rituximab era

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 184, 期 5, 页码 753-759

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15708

关键词

follicular lymphoma; response duration; prognosis; rituximab

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI16/00420]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2015-64885-R]
  3. Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent disease characterized by long survival but frequent relapses. Before the introduction of rituximab, the clinical course of these patients showed a shorter response duration (RD) after each relapse. In this study, we analysed if this pattern of shortened responses remains in patients treated in the rituximab era. We selected 348 patients newly diagnosed with FL in two institutions between 2001 and 2014 that received chemoimmunotherapy. After a median follow-up of 6 center dot 3 years, 10-year progression-free and overall survivals were 53% and 72%, respectively. All patients received first-line, 111 second-line and 41 third-line treatments, with a 5-year RD of 62%, 39% and 24%, respectively (P < 0 center dot 0001). Variables predicting longer RD after first-line treatment were normal beta 2microglobulin, complete remission achievement and maintenance with rituximab. Patients with longer RD after first-line showed significantly longer RD after second-line therapy. Autologous stem-cell transplantation after second-line therapy did not significantly impact RD. Median survival after first, second and third therapies was not reached, 7 center dot 6 and 4 center dot 8 years, respectively, whereas relative survival with respect to a sex- and age-matched Spanish population, the decrease in the life expectancy at 10 years was 17%, 45% and 79%, respectively. Thus, RD still shortens after each relapse in patients with FL treated in first line with rituximab combinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据