4.7 Review

Three decades of nucleic acid aptamer technologies: Lessons learned, progress and opportunities on aptamer development

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 28-50

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.001

关键词

SELEX; Aptamer; SELEX library; Synthetic genetic polymers; Single-strand DNA preparation; PCR bias

资金

  1. Department of Health (Merit Award) the Western Australian Government, Australia
  2. McCusker Charitable Foundation
  3. Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science
  4. Murdoch University
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773175, 11704343]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630839]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aptamers are short single-stranded nucleic acid sequences capable of binding to target molecules in a way similar to antibodies. Due to various advantages such as prolonged shelf life, low batch to batch variation, low/no immunogenicity, freedom to incorporate chemical modification for enhanced stability and targeting capacity, aptamers quickly found their potential in diverse applications ranging from therapy, drug delivery, diagnosis, and functional genomics to bio-sensing. Aptamers are generated by a process called SELEX. However, the current overall success rate of SELEX is far from being satisfactory, and still presents a major obstacle for aptamer-based research and application. The need for an efficient selection strategy consisting of defined procedures to deal with a wide variety of targets is significantly important. In this work, by analyzing key aspects of SELEX including initial library design, target preparation, PCR optimization, and single strand DNA separation, we provide a comprehensive analysis of individual steps to facilitate researchers intending to develop personalized protocols to address many of the obstacles in SELEX. In addition, this review provides suggestions and opinions for future aptamer development procedures to address the concerns on key SELEX steps, and post-SELEX modifications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据