4.8 Article

Equipping Inner Central Components of Influenza A Virus with Quantum Dots

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 23, 页码 14020-14028

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03995

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2018ZX10301405]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21535005]
  3. 111 Project [111-2-10]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center for Chemistry and Molecular Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza A virus (IAV), a risk to public health, is enveloped and contains viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complexes, where vRNP complexes are central to every aspect of the IAV life cycle. Labeling both the vRNP complexes and viral envelope with quantum dots (QDs) is conducive to achieving global long-term tracking of a single IAV infecting host cell, which has potential to provide valuable information for revealing mechanisms of IAV infection. However, even though some strategies for labeling of the viral envelope with QDs have been developed, there are few strategies for coupling of QDs to the vRNP complexes inside IAV so far. Herein, we devised a convenient electroporation-based strategy, coupled with antibody binding, to transfer green QDs-labeled nucleoprotein antibodies (GQDs-NPAb) into H1N1 and achieved the labeling of vRNP complexes with QDs [H1N1(GQDs)]. Under the optimal condition of 20 nM GQDs-NPAb and a single pulse with 20 ms duration and 750 V/cm pulse intensity, the actual efficiency of labeling is ca. 34% and H1N1(GQDs) can retain 93% infectivity. Then, dual labeling of H1N1 was realized by labeling the envelope of H1N1(GQDs) with red QDs (RQDs) via a mild and efficient hydrazine-aldehyde-based strategy. At the optimal RQDs concentration of 5 nM, the actual efficiency of dual labeling can reach to 11% and the dual-labeled H1N1 can retain 93% infectivity. Because of the similar components and structure of different IAV subtypes, this dual-labeling strategy is applicable to other subtypes of IAV, e.g., H9N2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据