4.4 Article

Exogenous glutamine impairs neutrophils migration into infections sites elicited by lipopolysaccharide by a multistep mechanism

期刊

AMINO ACIDS
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 451-462

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-018-2679-3

关键词

Glutamine; Inflammation; Neutrophils; Migration; CD11b; CD18

资金

  1. FundacAo de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo-FAPESP [2016/16463-8]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Tecnologia (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glutamine (GLN) is the most abundant free amino acid in the body, and is considered as a conditionally essential amino acid under stress conditions, acting as an important modulator of the immune response. We here investigated the role of exogenous GLN treatment on leukocyte migration after the onset of endotoxemia and the intracellular mechanisms of GLN actions on neutrophils. Two in vivo models of endotoxemia caused by lipopolysaccharide of Escherichia coli (LPS) injection were carried out in male outbred Balb/C mice 2-3months old, as follow: (1) LPS (50g/kg) was intravenously injected 1h prior to intravenous injection of GLN (0.75mg/kg) and samples were collected 2h later to investigate the role of GLN on the acute lung inflammation; (2) LPS (1mg/kg) was intraperitoneally injected 1h prior to intravenous injection of GLN (0.75mg/kg) and samples were collected 18h later to measure the effects of GLN on local and later phases of inflammation in the peritoneum. Results showed that GLN administration reduced the number of neutrophils in the inflamed lungs, partially recovery of the reduced number of leukocytes in the blood; reduced adhesion molecules on lung endothelium and on circulating neutrophils. Moreover, GLN treatment diminished the number of neutrophils, levels of chemotactic cytokine CXCL2 in the inflamed peritoneum, and neutrophils collected from the peritoneum of GLN-treated mice presented lower levels of Rho, Rac, and JNK. Together, our data show novel mechanisms involved in the actions of GLN on neutrophils migration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据