4.8 Article

Rationally Designed 3D Hydrogels Model Invasive Lung Diseases Enabling High-Content Drug Screening

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201806214

关键词

3D hydrogels; cancer; cell invasion; disease modeling; drug screening

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Special Accelerated Discovery grant by the McEwen Centre for Regenerative Medicine
  4. LAM Foundation Pilot grant [LAM0123P01-17]
  5. United States Department of Defense via the Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research Program of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program [W81XWH-14-1-0434]
  6. NSERC (PGSD)
  7. NSERC (CGSD)
  8. CIHR Banting and Ontario Institute of Regenerative Medicine Postdoctoral Fellowships
  9. Canadian Foundation for Innovation [19119]
  10. Ontario Research Fund [20120559-01H]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell behavior is highly dependent upon microenvironment. Thus, to identify drugs targeting metastatic cancer, screens need to be performed in tissue mimetic substrates that allow cell invasion and matrix remodeling. A novel biomimetic 3D hydrogel platform that enables quantitative analysis of cell invasion and viability at the individual cell level is developed using automated data acquisition methods with an invasive lung disease (lymphangioleiomyomatosis, LAM) characterized by hyperactive mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling as a model. To test the lung-mimetic hydrogel platform, a kinase inhibitor screen is performed using tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) hypomorphic cells, identifying Cdk2 inhibition as a putative LAM therapeutic. The 3D hydrogels mimic the native niche, enable multiple modes of invasion, and delineate phenotypic differences between healthy and diseased cells, all of which are critical to effective drug screens of highly invasive diseases including lung cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据