4.8 Article

Performance-Enhancing Selector via Symmetrical Multilayer Design

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201808376

关键词

1S1R; conductive filaments; multilayers; selector; TaOx; threshold switching

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0203800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51571128, 51671110]
  3. Beijing Innovation Center for Future Chip (ICFC)
  4. Young Chang Jiang Scholars Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-terminal selectors with high nonlinearity, based on bidirectional threshold switching (TS) behaviors, are considered as a crucial element of crossbar integration for emerging nonvolatile memory and neuromorphic network. Although great efforts have been made to obtain various selectors, existing selectors cannot fully satisfy the rigorous standard of assorted memristive elements and it is in great demand to enhance the performance. Here, a new type of Ag/TaOx/TaOy/TaOx/Ag (x < y) selector based on homogeneous trilayered oxides is developed to attain the required parameters including bidirectional TS operation, a large selectivity of approximate to 10(10), a high compliance current up to 1 mA, and ultralow switching voltages under 0.2 V. Tunable operation voltages can be realized by modulating the thickness of inserted TaOy. All-TaOx-based integrated 1S1R (one selector and one memristor) cells, prepared completely by magnetron sputtering and no need of a middle electrode, exhibit a nonlinear feature, which is quite characteristic for the crossbar devices, avoiding undesired crosstalk current issues. The tantalum-oxide-based homojunctions offer high insulation, low ion mobility, and rich interfaces, which is responsible for the modulation of Ag conductive filaments and corresponding high-performance cation-based selector. These findings might advance practical implementation of two-terminal selectors in emerging memories, especially resistive random access memories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据