4.8 Article

Patterning Smectic Liquid Crystals for OFETs at Low Temperature

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201804838

关键词

alignment; OFETs; patterning; smectic liquid crystals; terthiophene

资金

  1. National Key R&D Programme of China [2016YFB0402004]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51333001, 51602007, 51720105002]
  4. NSFC International Cooperation and Exchanges Projects [51561135014]
  5. Joint Foundation of the Equipment Pre-Research Chinese Ministry of Education [6141A020222]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The preparation of regular microstructures with liquid crystalline materials for organic field effect transistors (OFETs) is an attractive but challenging issue. However, it is usually limited by the difficulty of forming large-area single crystals aligned in a desirable direction. Herein, several terthiophene (TTP) smectic liquid crystals such as 8-TTP-8 and 12-TTP-11OH are patterned into highly crystalline microstripes by a sandwich system through a dewetting method. Morphology and orientation of the microstripes strongly depend on preparation temperature. Microstripes prepared below crystalline temperature are uniform, well-ordered, and show high field effect transistor (FET) mobility. Meanwhile, pi-pi stacking direction of the TTP backbone is perpendicular to the microstripe and the molecules stack in layer structure, standing up on the SiO2/Si substrate, which would provide an effective pathway for p-type charge transport. However, higher preparation temperatures at liquid crystalline or isotropic liquid range induce many defects in the crystal formation process and cause incline of the unit cell, thus leading to a sharp decrease in FET mobility. A possible mechanism of molecular stacking at different temperature range is proposed. This strategy promised to provide a new opportunity for the high cost-efficiency fabrication of OFETs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据