4.5 Article

The relationship among depressive symptoms, urgency, and problematic alcohol and cannabis use in community adults

期刊

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 36-42

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.009

关键词

Negative urgency; Positive urgency; Alcohol use; Cannabis use; Depression

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [T32 AA007462] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This study examined alternative models for how negative and positive urgency influence the relationship between depressive symptoms and alcohol and cannabis use in a community sample. Methods: Participants included adults (n = 675; age = 42.57, SD = 15.66; 65.0% female; 74.2% White) in the community sample from the Rockland Project by the Nathan Kline Institute. Path analyses were conducted. Results: Negative urgency was a unique mediator in the relationship between depressive symptoms and problematic alcohol use (beta = 0.121, 95% CI = 0.060-0.182) and problematic cannabis use(beta = 0.120, 95% CI = 0.060-0.179). Negative and positive urgency significantly moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and problematic cannabis use (negative urgency: beta = 0.092, 95% CI = 0.040-0.145; positive urgency: beta = 0.070, 95% CI = 0.022-0.119), such that the relationship was positive at high levels and negative at low levels of urgency. The patterns and levels of the relationships between depressive symptoms and cannabis use differed between negative and positive urgency. Neither urgency trait moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and problematic alcohol use. Conclusions: Despite being strongly related, negative and positive urgency have distinct roles in the relationship between depressive symptoms and problematic alcohol and cannabis use. Previous finding with younger samples that do not include both traits in the model at time generalize and at other times do not replicate, which warrants the continued examination of how these traits impart risk across the lifespan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据