4.8 Article

Integrated Endotoxin Adsorption and Antibacterial Properties of Cationic Polyurethane Foams for Wound Healing

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 2860-2869

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b19746

关键词

endotoxin adsorption; antibacterial; imidazolium cation; polyurethane foam; mouse model

资金

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [21425417]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21704071, U1862109, 81571930, 81772115]
  3. General Program Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [201740107]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  5. Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University [2017ZSCX03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gram-negative bacteria, containing toxic proin-flammatory and pyrogenic substances [endotoxin or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)], can lead to infection and associated serious diseases, such as sepsis and septic shock. Development of antimicrobial materials with intrinsically endotoxin adsorption activity can prevent the release of bacterial toxic components while killing bacteria. Herein, a series of imidazolium-type polyurethane (PU) foams with antimicrobial properties were synthesized. The content effects of cationic moieties on the antimicrobial activities against Gramnegative Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus as well as the endotoxin adsorption property were investigated. The obtained PU foams show slightly higher efficiency against two Gram-negative strains than for Gram-positive one and high absorbability of LPS. A wound healing test using P. aeruginosa and its isolated LPS-treated mice as the models further demonstrated that imidazolium-type PU foams combine both antibacterial and endotoxin adsorption properties and may have a potential application as an antimicrobial wound dressing in a clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据