4.8 Article

Hygroscopic Auxetic On-Skin Sensors for Easy-to-Handle Repeated Daily Use

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 46, 页码 40141-40148

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b13857

关键词

on-skin sensor; healthcare; auxetic structure; reusable sensor; stretchable electronics; electrocardiogram

资金

  1. Center for Advanced Soft Electronics - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [CASE-2015M3A6A5072945]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2017R1A4A1015811]
  3. Sports Promotion Fund of Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Foundation from the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism [s072016r2112016A0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the advance of on-skin sensors over the last decade, a sensor that solves simultaneously the critical issues for using in everyday life, such as stable performance in various environments, use over a long period of time, and repeated use by easy handling, has not yet been achieved. Here, we introduce an auxetic hygroscopic sensor that simultaneously meets all of the conditions. The auxetic structure with a negative Poisson's ratio matches with deformation of the skin in ankles; hence, a conformal contact between the sensor and the skin could be maintained during repeated movements. Sweat was absorbed in the auxetic electrode made of a hydrogel pattern coated with Ag nanowires and evaporated quickly; such hygroscopic characteristic led to excellent breathability. An electrocardiogram sensor and a haptic device were fabricated according to the proposed design for a sensor electrode. The sensors provide stable detecting performance in various environments, such as exercising, submersion in water, exposure to concentrated salt water, and continuous wearing for long time (7 days). Also, the sensors could be manually attached repeatedly without degrading the performance. This study provides new structural insights for on-skin sensors and presents future research directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据