4.6 Article

Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of xylo-oligosaccharides manufacturing waste residue for L-lactic acid production by Rhizopus oryzae

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 92-99

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2014.11.020

关键词

Cellulose; Fermentation; Filamentous fungi; Lactic acid; Rhizopus oryzae; Xylo-oligosaccharides

资金

  1. International Advanced Forestry Technology Introduction Project [2012-4-18]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20131426]
  3. Excellent Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK2012038]
  4. Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University
  5. Graduate Research Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province Ordinary University [CXZZ13_0544]
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High substrate cost and low lactic acid yield are the most pressing concerns in fermentative production of L-lactic acid by Rhizopus oryzae. In this study, waste residue from corncob after xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS) manufacturing was used as an alternative abundant, renewable, and inexpensive substrate for L-lactic acid production. After enzymatic hydrolysis, both glucose and xylose in the hydrolysate were converted to 34.0 g L-1 of L-lactic acid, equivalent to a yield of 0.34 g g(-1) dry waste residue, by R. oryzae in separate hydrolysis and fermentation. In contrast, a higher L-lactic acid titer (60.3 g L-1) and yield (0.60 g g(-1) dry waste residue) were achieved in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) with 10% (w/v) substrate loading at 40 degrees C, demonstrating, for the first time, the feasibility of L-lactic acid production from XOS manufacturing waste residues. The SSF process for L-lactic acid production from XOS waste residues was also demonstrated in a 5-L stirred-tank bioreactor, although further optimization would be necessary. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据