4.0 Article

Histomorphometric analysis of an adolescent distal tibial physis prior to growth plate closure

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 315-319

出版社

BRITISH EDITORIAL SOC BONE JOINT SURGERY
DOI: 10.1007/s11832-008-0121-1

关键词

Epiphysiodesis; Physis; Histomorphometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Our current understanding of the rate and pattern of physeal closure is based on roentgenographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and qualitative histological studies. The purpose of this report is to provide a detailed histomor-phometric/stereological analysis of a distal tibial human growth plate in the process of physiological epiphysiodesis. Methods A human distal tibial growth plate was sampled in three regions (anterior, central, and posterior), with each region further separated medially, in the middle, and laterally. The regions were assessed for the location and extent of bony bar formation as well as for physeal height. Companion sections from optimally fixed tissue in the distal 100 mu m of the hypertrophic zone were analyzed for hypertrophic chondrocytic volumes. Results Physis closure started in the middle of the central region of the growth plate, with 46% of the volume in this area occupied by trans-physeal bridging bone. The growth plate was also narrowed with the lowest physeal heights evident in the middle of the central and anterior regions of the physis. Disruption of the regular columns of the physis was evident with the cells arranged in clusters with intervening areas of acellularity. The average hypertrophic cell volume was 5,900 mu m(3) and did not significantly differ between different areas of the physis. Conclusions This is the first characterization of closure in a human distal tibial growth plate via optimum fixation and stereological techniques. The studied physis was during the earliest phases of closure and provides stereological support that the distal tibial physis closes in a central to medial direction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据