4.5 Article

Influence of operating conditions on the performance of biomass-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

期刊

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 253-263

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-012-0060-4

关键词

Biomass; Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; Pressure influence; CO conversion; Product distribution

资金

  1. Albemarle Catalyst Company
  2. European Social Fund
  3. Romanian Government [ID59321]
  4. COMET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The environmental concerns and the European liquid (bio) fuel regulations have determined a growing demand on biofuels. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis can provide clean synthetic fuels containing low concentrations of sulfur, nitrogen, and aromatics. While Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using natural gas and coal is a well established and commercialized process for more than 70 years, the new technology of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using biomass as feedstock is gaining more and more attention due to the possibilities of using renewable raw materials. In this work, in order to optimize the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, the influence of operating conditions has been studied in a slurry reactor using a Co-based catalyst. Experiments were performed at different syngas composition (variation of H-2/CO ratio) and pressure (24, 20, and 16 bar), keeping the other parameters (temperature, 230 degrees C; gas flow, 5 Nm(3)/h) constant. The effects of pressure on CO conversion, product distribution, C5+ selectivity, Par/Ole ratio, and alpha value were investigated, and the results were compared with data from literature. It was found that-increasing the reaction pressure-heavier hydrocarbons were formed, and CO conversion increased from 44.2 to 63.7 %. A slight change has been observed in the case of an a value between 0.89 and 0.9, C5+ selectivity between 90.6 and 91.7 %, and Par/Ole ratio between 11.4 and 14.1. An important role for the results obtained was attributed to H-2/CO ratio variation during the experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据