4.2 Article

Reference intervals for parathyroid hormone for 70-year-old males and females: exclusion of individuals from the reference interval based on sex, calcium, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases or reduced kidney function has limited effects on the interval

期刊

ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 39-43

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0004563214526170

关键词

70-year-old population; albumin; calcium; human; parathyroid hormone; reference interval; biological marker

资金

  1. Uppsala University Hospital Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background A problem when producing reference intervals for elderly individuals is that they often suffer from a number of diseases and they are most often on medication. If all such persons are excluded, there is a risk that the residual subgroup may not be representative of the population, we therefore wanted to compare the effects different exclusion criteria has on the reference intervals. Methods We measured parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, albumin and cystatin C in a cohort of 70-year-old males and females (n=1003). Reference intervals for PTH for males and females were calculated for the entire population and after exclusion of persons with calcium >2.60mmol/L, calcium >2.51mmol/L, diabetes, reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and cardiovascular diseases. Results The calculated PTH reference interval 16 (CI 14-17) to 94 (CI 87-101)ng/L. Exclusion of study subjects resulted in smaller reference sample groups, but the reference limits remained within the 90% confidence intervals of the original reference limits. The selections thus had a very limited effect on the calculated reference interval for PTH. Conclusions Exclusion of elderly individuals with high calcium concentrations, diabetes, reduced GFR or cardiovascular disease has little effect on the reference interval for PTH. It is better not to exclude these individuals, as it will provide a broader base for the reference interval.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据