4.2 Article

Accuracy Evaluation of CONTOUR®PLUS Compared With Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems

期刊

DIABETES THERAPY
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 377-388

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13300-015-0121-3

关键词

Accuracy; MARD; Self-monitoring of blood glucose

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of 5 blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMSs; CONTOUR (R) PLUS [CP], Accu-Chek (R) Active [ACA], Accu-Chek (R) Performa [ACP], FreeStyle Freedom (TM) [FF], OneTouch (R) SelectSimple (TM) [OTSS]). Methods: Study staff tested fingerstick samples from 106 subjects aged >= 18 years using the 5 BGMSs. Some samples were modified to achieve blood glucose concentrations throughout the measuring range. The primary endpoint was comparison of the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) from the reference value (Yellow Springs Instruments [YSI]) across the overall tested glucose range. Other endpoints were MARD in the low (<= 80 mg/dL [<= 4.4 mmol/L]), middle (81-180 mg/dL [4.5-10.0 mmol/L]), and high (>180 mg/dL [>10.0 mmol/L]) glucose ranges, and MARD for unmodified samples in the overall glucose range. Results: CONTOUR (R) PLUS had a statistically significantly lower MARD than all BGMSs across the overall tested range (27-460 mg/dL [1.5-25.5mmol/L]) and in the high glucose range. In the low glucose range, CP had a lower MARD than all BGMSs, which was statistically significant except for ACP. For unmodified samples across the overall tested range, CP had a lower MARD than all BGMSs and was statistically significantly lower except for ACA. Conclusions: CONTOUR (R) PLUS had the lowest mean difference from the reference values (by MARD) when compared with other BGMSs across multiple glucose ranges with modified and unmodified samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据