4.2 Article

Contribution of lipid-reactive natural killer T cells to obesity-associated inflammation and insulin resistance

期刊

ADIPOCYTE
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 12-16

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/adip.22296

关键词

CD1d; diabetes; immunotherapy; inflammation; insulin resistance; lipid; metabolic disease; natural killer T cells; obesity

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. American Diabetes Association
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL089667] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI050953, R01AI070305] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK081536] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS044044] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity is associated with a low-grade, chronic inflammation that promotes the development of a variety of diseases, most notably type 2 diabetes. A number of cell types of the innate and adaptive immune systems have been implicated in this process. Recent studies have focused on the role of natural killer T (NKT) cells, a subset of T lymphocytes that react with lipids, in the development of obesity-associated diseases. These studies have shown that invariant NKT (iNKT) cells, a population of NKT cells expressing a semi-invariant T cell receptor, become rapidly activated in response to lipid excess, and that these cells influence the capacity of other leukocytes to produce cytokines during the progression of obesity. The role of NKT cells in obesity-associated inflammation and insulin resistance has been investigated using NKT celldeficient animals, adoptive transfer of NKT cells and an iNKT cell agonist. While divergent results have been obtained, it is now clear that NKT cells can modulate the inflammatory milieu in obesity, suggesting that these cells could be targeted for therapeutic intervention in obesity-associated diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据