4.6 Article

Chromogenic Multiplex Immunohistochemistry Reveals Modulation of the Immune Microenvironment Associated with Survival in Elderly Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma

期刊

CANCERS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers10090326

关键词

elderly; lung adenocarcinoma; multiplex immunohistochemistry; brightfield; immunosenescence

类别

资金

  1. Canceropole PACA, France
  2. French Government (Agence Nationale de Recherche, ANR) through the 'Investments for the Future' LABEX SIGNALIFE, France [ANR-11-LABX-0028-01]
  3. Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, France [ARC SL220110603478]
  4. CANC'AIR Genexposomic project, France
  5. Conseil Departemental des Alpes-Maritimes, France
  6. Region Provence Alpes-Cote d'Azur, France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With underrepresentation of elderly patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 clinical trials, better understanding of the interplay of PD-L1 and tumor-associated immune cells (TAICs) could assist clinicians in stratifying these patients for immunotherapy. One hundred and one patients with LADCs, stratified by age, were included for analysis of PD-L1 expression and density of TAICs expressing CD4, CD8, and CD33, by using multiplex chromogenic immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays and automated digital quantification. The CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio was significantly higher in elderly patients. In patients <75 years, the density of CD4(+), CD8(+), and PD-L1 in TAICs showed a positive significant correlation with PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (TCs), while a lower correlation was observed in the elderly population. In the latter, a high CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio, and combined PD-L1 expression >= 1% TCs with a low CD8(+) density, low CD33(+) density, and a high CD4(+) density correlated to worse overall survival. We identified differences according to age in the CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio and in correlation between PD-L1 expression and the density of TAICs in LADC patients. Distinct groups of tumor microenvironments had an impact on the OS of elderly patients with LADC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据