4.5 Article

Autophagy proteins suppress protective type I interferon signalling in response to the murine gut microbiota

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 1131-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-018-0229-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institute of Health (NIH) [R01 HL123340, R01 DK093668, R01 DK103788, R01 AI121244, F31 DK111139, T32 AI100853]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. Merieux Institute
  4. Rainin Foundation Innovator Award
  5. Stony Wold-Herbert Fund
  6. Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Research Fellowship Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a conserved pathway that lies at the intersection between host defence and cellular homeostasis, autophagy serves as a rheostat for immune reactions. In particular, autophagy suppresses excess type I interferon (IFN-I) production in response to viral nucleic acids. It is unknown how this function of autophagy relates to the intestinal barrier where host-microbe interactions are pervasive and perpetual. Here, we demonstrate that mice deficient in autophagy proteins are protected from the intestinal bacterial pathogen Citrobacter rodentium in a manner dependent on IFN-I signalling and nucleic acid sensing pathways. Enhanced IFN-stimulated gene expression in intestinal tissue of autophagy-deficient mice in the absence of infection was mediated by the gut microbiota. Additionally, monocytes infiltrating into the autophagy-deficient intestinal microenvironment displayed an enhanced inflammatory profile and were necessary for protection against C. rodentium. Finally, we demonstrate that the microbiota-dependent IFN-I production that occurs in the autophagy-deficient host also protects against chemical injury of the intestine. Thus, autophagy proteins prevent a spontaneous IFN-I response to microbiota that is beneficial in the presence of infectious and non-infectious intestinal hazards. These results identify a role for autophagy proteins in controlling the magnitude of IFN-I signalling at the intestinal barrier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据