4.6 Article

Haze Days in North China and the associated atmospheric circulations based on daily visibility data from 1960 to 2012

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 120, 期 12, 页码 5895-5909

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023225

关键词

haze; atmospheric circulations; North China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41421004, 41130103, 41305061]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB955401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Haze is a severe hazard that greatly influences traffic and daily life with great economic losses and threats to human health. To enhance understanding of the haze occurrences, this study examined the haze variations over North China and their associated atmospheric circulations for the period of 1960-2012 using daily visibility data. Results indicate that the haze events over this region primarily occur in boreal winter of year and mainly in the morning of day. The results of the analysis of the long-term variations indicate that the annual haze days were relatively few in the 1960s but increased steeply in the 1970s and have remained stable to the present. Some differences are obvious among seasons. A stably increasing trend is discernable in summer and autumn, relatively low in the 1960s and the 1990s-2000s and relatively high in the 1970s-1980s in spring and winter. Haze variations in urban regions are quite similar to haze variations in rural regions but with more haze days in urban regions because of the high aerosol emissions. Further analyses indicate that the occurrences of severe haze events in boreal winter generally correlate with the weakened northerly winds and the development of inversion anomalies in the lower troposphere, the weakened East Asian trough in the midtroposphere, and the northward East Asian jet in the high troposphere. All of these factors provide a favorable atmospheric background for the maintenance and development of haze events in this region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据