4.2 Article

Examining microstructural composition of hardened cement paste cured under high temperature and pressure using nanoindentation and 29Si MAS NMR

期刊

APPLIED NANOSCIENCE
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 445-456

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-012-0058-z

关键词

Nanoindentation; Si-29 MAS NMR; Cement; Microstructural phases

资金

  1. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) through the Science and Technology Unit at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) as part of the National Science, Technology and Innovation Plan [09-NAN754-04]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) award [1131369]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0960256] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1131369] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microstructural composition of the hardened cement pastes are analyzed using nanoindentation and Si-29 MAS NMR after curing time periods of 7 and 28 days. Two curing conditions, room condition (20 degrees C with 0.1 MPa pressure) and an elevated condition (80 degrees C with 10 MPa pressure) are prepared to hydrate cement pastes [water to cement (w/c) ratio of 0.45]. The degree of hydration of the cement paste quantified using nanoindentation was compared with that from Si-29 MAS NMR. From nanoindentation of the hardened cement pastes, microstructural hydration products are characterized with respect to the corresponding modulus of elasticity. A hydration product, which has a relatively high modulus of elasticity over other known hydration products, was found in the hardened cement paste cured in elevated temperature and pressure. The effect of high pressure on the composition of the hydration product is discussed and it is hypothesized that the packing density of calcium-silicatc-hydratc (C-S-H) might increase when a cement paste is hydrated under high temperature and pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据