4.2 Article

Controlling the optimum dose of AMPTS functionalized-magnetite nanoparticles for hyperthermia cancer therapy

期刊

APPLIED NANOSCIENCE
卷 1, 期 4, 页码 237-246

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-011-0032-1

关键词

Hyperthermia; Magnetic nanoparticles dose; SAR; Tumor

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korean (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0016412]
  2. National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family affairs, Republic of Korea [2010-0920190]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵09B1116, 2009-0075050] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic hyperthermia has been used for many years to treat a variety of malignant tumors. One of the problems in magnetic hyperthermia is the choice of the correct particle concentration to achieve a defined temperature increase in the tumor tissue. In this study, we evaluated magnetic heat distribution induced by Fe3O4-APTMS magnetic nanoparticles in agar tissue phantom when it subjected to the AC magnetic filed. Using the correct nanoparticle dosage and considering their specific loss power, it is possible to estimate the efficiency of this therapeutic method. The experimental data were compared with a computer-based model, which were created using COM-SOL Multiphysics to simulate the heat dissipation within the tissue for typical configurations of the tumor position as well as particle distribution within the tumor. Heating the cancer cells up to 50 degrees C for 10 min was sufficient for complete cell killing and the heat dose of 19.9 W/g(tissue) is required for 5-mm tumor. Cell viability assay showed that MNPs exhibited no significant cytotoxicity against HeLa cells. Additionally, it was observed that the FITC-labeled Fe3O4-APTMS MNPs presented high cell biocompatibility and cellular uptake for efficient endocytosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据