4.7 Article

Ubiquitous Monitoring for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems Over Relay-Assisted Wireless Sensor Networks

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TETC.2014.2386615

关键词

Cyber-physical system; ubiquitous monitoring; wireless sensor network; relay; consensus; estimation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [U1405251, 61273181, 61221003, 61290322, 61174127]
  2. Ministry of Education, China [NCET-13-0358, 20110073120025]
  3. Science and Technology Commission through Shanghai Municipality, China [13QA1401900]
  4. Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China [B832, 14LGA010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ubiquitous monitoring over wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is of increasing interest in industrial cyber-physical systems (CPSs). Question of how to understand a situation of physical system by estimating process parameters is largely unexplored. This paper is concerned with the distributed estimation problem for industrial automation over relay-assisted WSNs. Different from most existing works on WSN with homogeneous sensor nodes, the network considered in this paper consists of two types of nodes, i.e., sensing nodes (SNs), which is capable of sensing and computing, and relay nodes (RNs), which is only capable of simple data aggregation. We first adopt a Kalman filtering (KF) approach to estimate the unknown physical parameters. In order to facilitate the decentralized implementation of the KF algorithm in relay-assisted WSNs, a tree-based broadcasting strategy is provided for distributed sensor fusion. With the fused information, the consensus-based estimation algorithms are proposed for SNs and RNs, respectively. The proposed method is applied to estimate the slab temperature distribution in a hot rolling process monitoring system, which is a typical industrial CPS. It is demonstrated that the introduction of RNs improves temperature estimation efficiency and accuracy compared with the homogeneous WSN with SNs only.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据