4.1 Article

Investigating the insecticidal potential of Geomyces (Myxotrichaceae: Helotiales) and Mortierella (Mortierellacea: Mortierellales) isolated from Antarctica

期刊

SPRINGERPLUS
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-289

关键词

Cold; Fungus; Biological control; Host range; Insecticide

资金

  1. Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) [MYIP 719 InnB]
  2. British Antarctic Survey (BAS) Polar Science for Planet Earth (PSPE) programme
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [bas0100025] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [bas0100025] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fungi isolated from environmentally challenging habitats can have adaptations of potential value when developed as insect pest-controls. Fungal isolates collected from Antarctica, Geomyces sp. I, Geomyces sp. II, Mortierella signyensis and M. alpina, were investigated for (i) growth characteristics at 0-35 degrees C, (ii) spore production at 10 and 20 degrees C, (iii) viability following exposure to freezing temperatures, and (iv) insecticidal activity against waxmoths (Galleria mellonella L.), houseflies (Musca domestica L.), mealworms (Tenebrio molitor L.) and black vine weevils (Otiorhynchus sulcatus Fabricius). All isolates showed growth between 5-20 degrees C, with some showing growth outside this range. Geomyces isolates sporulated over a wider range of conditions than the Mortierella isolates. Spore germination at 10 degrees C was higher for Geomyces sp. II when this isolate was produced at 10 compared to 20 degrees C (greatest difference 74.6 vs 32.7%). All isolates grew, with the exception of M. alpina, following exposure to -20 degrees C for 4 weeks. Insecticidal investigations showed M. alpina and M. signyensis caused significant mortality of waxmoth and housefly larvae via injection and soil inoculation, and M. alpina caused significant mortality of housefly larvae via baiting; the Geomyces isolates had little lethal effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据