4.6 Article

DICER1 Is Essential for Self-Renewal of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

期刊

STEM CELL REPORTS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 616-625

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.07.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. MSKCC Functional Genomics Initiative
  2. NIH/NIDDK [R01DK096239]
  3. MSKCC Cancer Center support grant [P30CA008748]
  4. NIH [T32HD060600]
  5. R01 Supplement grant [3R01DK096239-03S1]
  6. NIH/NIGMS [R01-GM083300]
  7. NIH/NHLBI [R01-HL135564]
  8. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [T32HD060600] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL135564] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK096239] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  12. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM083300] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are the effectors of a conserved gene-silencing system with broad roles in post-transcriptional regulation. Due to functional overlaps, assigning specific functions to individual miRNAs has been challenging. DICER1 cleaves pre-miRNA hairpins into mature miRNAs, and previously Dicer1 knockout mouse embryonic stem cells have been generated to study miRNA function in early mouse development. Here we report an essential requirement of DICER1 for the self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Utilizing a conditional knockout approach, we found that DICER1 deletion led to increased death receptor-mediated apoptosis and failure of hESC self-renewal. We further devised a targeted miRNA screening strategy and uncovered essential pro-survival roles of members of the mir-302-367 and mir-371-373 clusters that bear the seed sequence AAGUGC. This platform is uniquely suitable for dissecting the roles of individual miRNAs in hESC self-renewal and differentiation, which may help us better understand the early development of human embryos.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据