4.1 Article

A variation in the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and a comparison with MODIS data in burned black spruce forests of interior Alaska

期刊

POLAR SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 113-124

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2013.03.004

关键词

Boreal forest; Fire scar; FPAR/LAI; Vegetation index; Vegetation recovery

资金

  1. NSF under the Carbon Cycle Program of IARC/NSF
  2. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) under the Arctic Research Plan Utilizing the IARC-JAXA Information System (IJIS) and Satellite Imagery
  3. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) under the JAMSTEC and IARC Collaboration Studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Absorption of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by vegetation was observed in two burned black spruce forests, one and seven years after wildfire, in interior Alaska along with several vegetation properties. This study considered PAR absorption by mosses by examining the relationship between PAR transmittance and fractional coverage of green vegetation. Our results suggest that mosses absorbed a considerable fraction of incoming PAR in the burned forests, which cannot be neglected in evaluating the fraction of absorbed PAR (FPAR). The relationships between FPAR and vegetation indices revealed that enhanced vegetation index (EVI) may be suitable for expressing the spatial and temporal variation of FPAR, regardless of stand age after wildfire. The comparison between the observed in situ FPAR and FPAR derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS FPAR) clearly showed that MODIS FPAR was highly overestimated. The most likely reason for the overestimation was identified as misclassification of land cover type. The current regional estimation of photosynthesis in boreal region based on the light-use efficiency approach and MODIS FPAR is probably overestimated, and an accurate distribution of FPAR is desired for clarifying the regional carbon exchange in boreal forests. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. and NIPR. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据