4.1 Article

Latitudinal distribution of soil CO2 efflux and temperature along the Dalton Highway, Alaska

期刊

POLAR SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 162-173

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2012.11.002

关键词

Soil CO2 efflux; Temperature; Moisture; Tundra; Boreal black spruce forest

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)
  2. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)
  3. Korea Ministry of Environment as The Eco-Technopia 21 Project [2010-05002-0083-0]
  4. Japanese Ministry of Environment as Observational Arctic Terrestrial Carbon Dynamics Research and their Modeling for Predicting Global Climate Change
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24656132] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we investigate spatial variations in soil CO2 efflux and carbon dynamics across five sites located between 65.5 degrees N and 69.0 degrees N in tundra and boreal forest biomes of Alaska. Growing and winter mean CO2 effluxes for the period 2006-2010 were 261 +/- 124 (Coefficients of Variation: 48%) and 71 +/- 42 (CV: 59%) gCO(2)/m(2), respectively. This indicates that winter CO2 efflux contributed 24% of the annual CO2 efflux over the period of measurement. In tundra and boreal biomes, tussock is an important source of carbon efflux to the atmosphere, and contributes 3.4 times more than other vegetation types. To ensure that representativeness of soil CO2 efflux was determined, 36 sample points were used at each site during the growing season, so that the experimental mean fell within +/- 20% of the full sample mean at 80% and 90% confidence levels. We found that soil CO2 efflux was directly proportional to the seasonal mean soil temperature, but inversely proportional to the seasonal mean soil moisture level, rather than to the elevation-corrected July air temperature. This suggests that the seasonal mean soil temperature is the dominant control on the latitudinal distribution of soil CO2 efflux in the high-latitude ecosystems of Alaska. Published by Elsevier B.V. and NIPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据