4.7 Article

A gut-brain neural circuit controlled by intestinal gluconeogenesis is crucial in metabolic health

期刊

MOLECULAR METABOLISM
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 106-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2014.12.009

关键词

Intestinal gluconeogenesis; Insulin sensitivity; Insulin secretion; Autonomous nervous system; Hypothalamus; Type 2 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Certain nutrients positively regulate energy homeostasis via intestinal gluconeogenesis (IGN). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a deficient IGN in glucose control independently of nutritional environment. Methods: We used mice deficient in the intestine glucose-6 phosphatase catalytic unit, the key enzyme of IGN (I-G6pc(-/-) mice). We evaluated a number of parameters involved in energy homeostasis, including insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinemic euglycaemic clamp), the pancreatic function (insulin secretion in vivo and in isolated islets) and the hypothalamic homeostatic function (leptin sensitivity). Results: Intestinal-G6pc(-/-) mice exhibit slight fasting hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and a deteriorated pancreatic function, despite normal diet with no change in body weight. These defects evoking type 2 diabetes (T2D) derive from the basal activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). They are corrected by treatment with an inhibitor of alpha-2 adrenergic receptors. Deregulation in a key target of IGN, the homeostatic hypothalamic function (highlighted here through leptin resistance) is a mechanistic link. Hence the leptin resistance and metabolic disorders in I-G6pc(-/-) mice are corrected by rescuing IGN by portal glucose infusion. Finally, I-G6pc(-/-) mice develop the hyperglycaemia characteristic of T2D more rapidly under high fat/high sucrose diet. Conclusions: Intestinal gluconeogenesis is a mandatory function for the healthy neural control of glucose homeostasis. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据