4.6 Article

Large-area arrays of three-dimensional plasmonic subwavelength-sized structures from azopolymer surface-relief gratings

期刊

MATERIALS HORIZONS
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 74-80

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3mh00008g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland (PHORMAT) [135159, 135106]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Foundations' Post Doc Pool in Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The field of plasmonics allows for confinement and control of light on the nanoscale. Due to potentially strong resonant interactions that light can have with metal nanoscale structures, metals are a good candidate to tailor interactions with light, e.g., periodic arrays of subwavelength metal structures can support extremely narrow resonances and show enhanced transmission. The field of plasmonics has evolved from using simple geometries to the desire to create complex nanostructures for improved control. The availability of fabrication techniques that provide for complex structures, however, is paired with the seemingly inevitable increase in complexity of fabrication techniques themselves. We present a facile and scalable method for the fabrication of periodic arrays of unique three-dimensional subwavelength-sized structures such as tapered holes and pyramidically shaped subwavelength-sized particles. The procedure consists of holographic inscription of a two-dimensional surface-relief grating in an azobenzene-containing polymer film, evaporative gold deposition and broad-beamion milling of the relief structure. The method allows the fabrication of highly uniformarrays with tunable lattice parameters and dimensions over large sample areas. The optical response of the fabricated structures is determined experimentally and through simulation, which confirm the unique plasmonic response of the structures. While the proposed fabrication method has clear benefits for plasmonics, it could easily be applied also in other fields, for example by using other coating materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据