4.4 Article

Generation of Dispersed Presomitic Mesoderm Cell Cultures for Imaging of the Zebrafish Segmentation Clock in Single Cells

期刊

出版社

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/50307

关键词

Developmental Biology; Issue 89; Zebrafish; Primary Cell Culture; Biological Clocks; Somitogenesis; Oscillator; In Vitro; Time-lapse Imaging; Primary Culture; Fluorescence

资金

  1. EMBO Long-term fellowship
  2. National Science Foundation International Postdoctoral Research Fellowship
  3. Max Planck Gesellschaft
  4. DIGS-BB fellowship
  5. European Research Council under the European Communities Seventh Framework Programme [STG-207634]
  6. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1202/3] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [MC_UP_1202/3] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Segmentation is a periodic and sequential morphogenetic process in vertebrates. This rhythmic formation of blocks of tissue called somites along the body axis is evidence of a genetic oscillator patterning the developing embryo. In zebrafish, the intracellular clock driving segmentation is comprised of members of the Her/Hes transcription factor family organized into negative feedback loops. We have recently generated transgenic fluorescent reporter lines for the cyclic gene her1 that recapitulate the spatio-temporal pattern of oscillations in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). Using these lines, we developed an in vitro culture system that allows real-time analysis of segmentation clock oscillations within single, isolated PSM cells. By removing PSM tissue from transgenic embryos and then dispersing cells from oscillating regions onto glass-bottom dishes, we generated cultures suitable for time-lapse imaging of fluorescence signal from individual clock cells. This approach provides an experimental and conceptual framework for direct manipulation of the segmentation clock with unprecedented single-cell resolution, allowing its cell-autonomous and tissue-level properties to be distinguished and dissected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据