4.3 Article

Removal of 2,4-Dichlorophenolyxacetic acid ( 2,4-D) herbicide in the aqueous phase using modified granular activated carbon

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/2052-336X-12-28

关键词

Herbicide; 2,4-D; Adsorption; Aqueous phase; Kinetics

资金

  1. Deputy of Research and Technology of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences [91-6275]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Low cost 2,4-Dichlorophenolyxacetic acid (2,4-D) widely used in controlling broad-leafed weeds is frequently detected in water resources. The main objectives of this research were focused on evaluating the feasibility of using granular activated carbon modified with acid to remove 2,4-D from aqueous phase, determining its removal efficiency and assessing the adsorption kinetics. Results: The present study was conducted at bench-scale method. The influence of different pH (3-9), the effect of contact time (3-90 min), the amount of adsorbent (0.1-0.4 g), and herbicide initial concentration (0.5-3 ppm) on 2,4-D removal efficiency by the granular activated carbon were investigated. Based on the data obtained in the present study, pH of 3 and contact time of 60 min is optimal for 2,4-D removal. 2,4-D reduction rate increased rapidly by the addition of the adsorbent and decreased by herbicide initial concentration (63%). The percent of 2,4-D reduction were significantly enhanced by decreasing pH and increasing the contact time. The adsorption of 2,4-D onto the granular activated carbon conformed to Langmuir and Freundlich models, but was best fitted to type II Langmuir model (R-2 = 0.999). The second order kinetics was the best for the adsorption of 2,4-D by modified granular activated carbon with R-2 > 0.99. Regression analysis showed that all of the variables in the process have been statistically significant effect (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, granular activated carbon modified with acid is an appropriate method for reducing the herbicide in the polluted water resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据