4.6 Article

Angiopoietin-like protein 2 induces proinflammatory responses in peritoneal cells

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.183

关键词

Monocyte; Macrophage; Inflammation; Cytokine production; Peritoneal cells

资金

  1. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  2. Friends of Leukemia Research Fund
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [25460595]
  5. NIH [1R01CA172268]
  6. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Award LLS [1024-14]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25460595] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monocytes and macrophages are important effectors and regulators of inflammation, and both their differentiation and activation are regulated strictly in response to environmental cues. Angiopoietin-like protein 2 (Angpt12) is a multifaceted protein, displaying many physiological and pathological functions in inflammation, angiogenesis, hematopoiesis, and tumor development. Although recent studies implicate Angpt12 in chronic inflammation, the mechanisms of inflammation caused by Angpt12 remain unclear. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the role of Angpt12 in inflammation by understanding the effects of Angpt12 on monocytes/macrophages. We showed that Angptl2 directly activates resident murine peritoneal monocytes and macrophages and induces a drastic upregulation of the transcription of several inflammatory genes including nitric oxide synthase 2 and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2, and several proinflammatory cytokine genes such as interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, TNF alpha, and CSF2, along with activation of ERK, JNK, p38, and nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathways. Concordantly, proinflammatory cytokines IL-1 beta, IL-6, TNF alpha, and GM-CSF, were rapidly elevated from murine peritoneal monocytes and macrophages. These results demonstrate a novel role for Angpt12 in inflammation via the direct activation of peritoneal monocytes and macrophages. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据