4.3 Article

Surface modification of three-dimensional Ca-P/PHBV nanocomposite scaffolds by physical entrapment of gelatin and its in vitro biological evaluation

期刊

FRONTIERS OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 57-68

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11706-011-0101-0

关键词

nanocomposite scaffold; selective laser sintering; surface modification; physical entrapment; cell behaviour

资金

  1. University of Hong Kong (HKU)
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council. [HKU 7182/05E, HKU 7181/09E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The properties of bone tissue engineering scaffolds such as architecture, porosity, mechanical properties and surface properties have significant effects on cellular response and play an important role in bone regeneration. In this study, three-dimensional nanocomposite scaffolds consisting of calcium phosphate (Ca-P) nanoparticles and poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) copolymer with controlled external and internal architectures were successfully produced via selective laser sintering (SLS), one of the versatile rapid prototyping techniques. The Ca-P/PHBV nanocomposite scaffolds had a porosity of (61.75 +/- 1.24)%, compressive strength of (2.16 +/- 0.21) MPa and Young's modulus of (26.98 +/- 2.29) MPa. The surface modification of scaffolds by gelatin was achieved through physical entrapment. The amount of entrapped gelatin could be controlled by varying the solvent composition and reaction time. The surface modification improved the hydrophilicity of scaffolds but did not significantly affect the surface morphology and mechanical properties. Osteoblast-like cells (SaOS-2) were cultured on scaffolds with and without gelatin surface modification. The majority of SaOS-2 cells were viable and proliferated in both types of scaffolds for up to 14 d in culture, as indicated by MTT assay and live and dead assay. Surface modification significantly increased cell proliferation for surface modified scaffolds, which could be due to the improvement in hydrophilicity of the scaffolds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据