4.3 Article

Heat shock preconditioning protects against ER stress-induced apoptosis through the regulation of the BH3-only protein BIM

期刊

FEBS OPEN BIO
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 813-821

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.fob.2014.09.004

关键词

Apoptosis; BCL-2 family; BIM; Endoplasmic reticulum stress; Heat shock; Unfolded protein response

资金

  1. College of Science of NUI Galway
  2. Science foundation Ireland [09/RFP/BIC2371, 09/RFP/BMT2153]
  3. Belgian grant - Interuniversity Attraction Poles [IAP 7/32]
  4. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [09/RFP/BIC2371, 09/RFP/BMT2153] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mild heat shock (HS) preconditioning and acquisition of thermotolerance protects cells against a variety of cytotoxic agents that otherwise induce apoptosis. Here we tested whether there is a molecular link between HS preconditioning and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced apoptosis. ER stress results from a loss of ER lumen homeostasis, culminating in an accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins in the ER and activation of unfolded protein response (UPR). Unresolved, ER stress leads to activation of BH3-only proteins, mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, caspase activation and apoptotic cell death. HS preconditioning (1 h at 42 degrees C) induced a rapid increase in HSPA1 (HSP70) levels which remained elevated for at least 48 h post-HS. HS preconditioning significantly reduced BAX, caspase activation and apoptosis in cell cultures treated with the ER stress-inducing agents thapsigargin (TG) and tunicamycin (TM). HS-mediated protection was found to be due to regulation of the BH3-only protein BIM. Further, overexpression of HSPA1 could not mimic the effect of HS on BIM expression, suggesting that other HS factors may play a role in inhibiting ER stress-induced apoptosis by regulating BIM. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据