4.5 Article

Etanercept Inhibits the Tumor Necrosis Factor α-Driven Shift of Th17 Lymphocytes Toward a Nonclassic Th1 Phenotype in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

期刊

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 66, 期 5, 页码 1372-1377

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.38355

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca
  2. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro
  3. AbbVie
  4. Novartis
  5. Genzyme
  6. Sobi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To evaluate the effects of etanercept on the phenotype of CD4+ T helper lymphocytes from patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods. We compared the proportions of various Th cell subsets in peripheral blood (PB) from etanercept-treated and untreated JIA patients. An in vitro study was performed on PB mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 15 children with untreated JIA, in which we evaluated the proliferative response of these cells, as well as their cytokine production profile, in the presence of various stimuli with or without etanercept. Results. We found lower proportions of CD4+ CD161+ (nonclassic) Th1 lymphocytes in the PB of patients treated with etanercept than in untreated patients. In vitro, etanercept inhibited the proliferative response induced by either polyclonal or recall antigen stimulation of PBMCs. Moreover, etanercept increased the proportion of CD4+ CD161+ Th17/Th1 and Th17 cells in vitro while decreasing the proportions of nonclassic Th1 cell subsets, leaving CD4+ CD161- (classic) Th1 cells unaffected. We also found that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) was able to induce transition of Th17 lymphocytes toward the nonclassic Th1 phenotype in vitro, probably due to the high expression of TNF receptor type II observed in Th17 cells. Conclusion. We have previously demonstrated the occurrence of a shifting of CD4+ CD161+ Th17 cells to the nonclassic Th1 phenotype in children with JIA. The present findings suggest that etanercept can exert its disease-modifying action by interfering with this shifting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据