4.5 Article

Characterization, feasibility and optimization of Agaricus subrufescens growth based on chemical elements on casing layer

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 343-347

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.04.002

关键词

Almond Mushroom; Growth models; Personal correlation; Calcium sources; Mushroom cultivation

类别

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [1184/09-1]
  2. Graduate Program (Energia na Agricultura) in Faculdade de Ciencias Agronomicas (FCA/UNESP, Brazil)
  3. Consejeria de Agricultura de Castilla-La Mancha
  4. Diputacion Provincial de Cuenca (Spain)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to analyze yields, biological efficiency, earliness (expressed as days to first harvest), and precociousness and establish models for the mushroom growing according to these parameters. The experiment followed a double factorial design with four sources of calcium (calcitic limestone, calcitic limestone + gypsum, dolomitic limestone and dolomitic limestone + gypsum) and 2 application times (25 days before casing and at the moment of casing), with 4 replicates for each treatment. Different calcium sources influenced differently Agaricus subrufescens production, especially as regards earliness, which showed significantly higher values when dolomitic limestone with gypsum was applied. Yield and biological efficiency were negatively correlated with H + AL, organic matter and Mg amount. Furthermore, earliness was positively correlated with H + Al, organic matter, and the amount of Mg and Fe. Finally, negative correlations were observed between precociousness and the amount of Ca, SB (sum of base), CEC (cation exchange capacity) and V% (percentage of base saturation). The models presented in this work are extremely important for predicting the agronomic performance of Agaricus subrufescens on the basis of chemical analysis provided by the casing soil. (c) 2012 King Saud University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据