4.1 Article

Eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms on cultured airway cells by a fosfomycin/tobramycin antibiotic combination

期刊

PATHOGENS AND DISEASE
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 39-45

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/2049-632X.12015

关键词

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; fosfomycin; biofilm; antibiotic resistance; tobramycin

资金

  1. RSFG from IUPUI
  2. PRF from Purdue University
  3. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI083256] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis (CF) lungs is a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with CF. To gain insights into effectiveness of novel anti-infective therapies, the inhibitory effects of fosfomycin, tobramycin, and a 4 : 1 (wt/wt) fosfomycin/tobramycin combination (FTI) on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown on cultured human CF-derived airway cells (CFBE41o-) were investigated. In preformed biofilms treated for 16 h with antibiotics, P. aeruginosa CFU per mL were reduced 4 log(10) units by both FTI and tobramycin at 256 mg L-1, while fosfomycin alone had no effect. Importantly, the FTI treatment contained five times less tobramycin than the tobramycin-alone treatment. Inhibition of initial biofilm formation was achieved at 64 mg L-1 FTI and 16 mg L-1 tobramycin. Fosfomycin (1024 mg L-1) did not inhibit biofilm formation. Cytotoxicity was also determined by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Intriguingly, sub-inhibitory concentrations of FTI (16 mg L-1) and tobramycin (4 mg L-1) and high concentrations of fosfomycin (1024 mg L-1) prevented bacterially mediated airway cell toxicity without a corresponding reduction in CFU. Overall, it was observed that FTI and tobramycin demonstrated comparable activity on biofilm formation and disruption. Decreased administration of tobramycin upon treatment with FTI might lead to a decrease in negative side effects of aminoglycosides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据