4.2 Article

An in vitro model for Pelger-Huet anomaly Stable knockdown of lamin B receptor in HL-60 cells

期刊

NUCLEUS-AUSTIN
卷 1, 期 6, 页码 506-512

出版社

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.1.6.13271

关键词

lamin B receptor; nuclear structure; Pelger-Huet anomaly; neutrophil; macrophage

资金

  1. European Union FP6 Marie Curie Research Training Network [MRTN-CT-2006-035733]
  2. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Molecular Genetics
  3. Bowdoin College

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The principal human blood granulocyte (neutrophil) possesses a lobulated and deformable nucleus, important to facilitate rapid egress from blood vessels as these cells migrate to sites of bacterial or fungal infection. This unusual nuclear shape is a product of elevated levels of an integral membrane protein of the nuclear envelope lamin B receptor (LBR) and of decreased amounts of lamin A/C. In humans, a genetic deficiency of LBR produces Pelger-Huet anomaly, resulting in blood neutrophils that exhibit hypolobulated nuclei with redistributed heterochromatin. Structural changes in nuclear architecture occur during granulopoiesis within bone marrow. The exact mechanisms of this nuclear shape change and of heterochromatin redistribution remain largely unknown. As a tool to facilitate analysis of these mechanisms, a stable LBR knockdown subline of HL-60 cells was established. During in vitro granulopoiesis induced with retinoic acid, the LBR knockdown cells retain an ovoid shaped nucleus with reduced levels of lamin A/C; while, the parent cells develop highly lobulated nuclei. In contrast, macrophage forms induced in LBR knockdown cells by in vitro treatment with phorbol ester were indistinguishable from the parent cells, judged by both nuclear shape and attached cell morphology. The capability of differentiation of LBR knockdown HL-60 cells should facilitate a detailed analysis of the molecular relationship between LBR levels, granulocyte nuclear shape and heterochromatin distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据