4.5 Article

SYNE1 Mutations in Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxia

期刊

JAMA NEUROLOGY
卷 70, 期 10, 页码 1296-1301

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3268

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type I, also known as recessive ataxia of Beauce, is a slowly progressive ataxia that leads to moderate disability with gait ataxia, dysarthria, dysmetria, mild oculomotor abnormalities, and diffuse cerebellar atrophy on brain imaging. Mutations in the synaptic nuclear envelope protein 1 (SYNE1) gene, located on chromosome 6p25, were first reported in patients who originated from a region known as Beauce in the province of Quebec, Canada. OBJECTIVE To better evaluate the prevalence of SYNE1 mutations in individuals with mild pure cerebellar ataxia and cerebellar atrophy, we screened the gene in additional French-Canadian (FC) families and individuals from other populations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Study participants were referred by their treating physician on the basis of core features of autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type I. After excluding individuals with known SYNE1 mutations, our cohort was composed mainly of 19 FCs and 21 individuals from other ethnic backgrounds. INTERVENTIONS Extraction of DNA from blood samples and complete resequencing of the SYNE1 gene. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The involvement of SYNE1 mutations in individuals with ataxia worldwide by resequencing the SYNE1 gene. RESULTS Two novel truncating mutations were found among the FC participants, and 2 other novel mutations were found in a patient from France and a patient from Brazil (1 mutation each). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This is the second report, to our knowledge, of SYNE1 gene mutations in a population other than FCs. These data suggest that mutations in SYNE1 should be investigated in families with cerebellar ataxia who live outside the FC region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据