4.3 Article

Experimental Study on the Flow Around Two Tandem Cylinders with Unequal Diameters

期刊

JOURNAL OF OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 761-770

出版社

OCEAN UNIV CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s11802-014-2377-z

关键词

tandem cylinders with unequal diameters; PIV; flow patterns; Reynolds stress distribution

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY14E090009]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics (Second Institute of Oceanography, SOA)
  3. State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power Transmission and Control [GZKF-201310]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, flow around two circular cylinders in tandem arrangement with unequal diameters has been investigated using the particle image velocimetry technique (PIV) in a water channel. The upstream to downstream diameter ratio was kept constant at d/D = 2/3, the centre-to-centre distance was varied from 1.2D to 5D and the Reynolds number was varied from 1200 to 4800. The flow characteristics were analyzed through ensemble-averaged patterns of velocity, vorticity, normalized Reynolds stress contours and streamlines. Based on ensemble-averaged and instantaneous flow fields, different flow patterns, including single-wake-shedding at small spacing ratio, bi-stable flow behavior (alternating behavior of reattachment and vortex shedding) at intermediate spacing ratio and co-shedding pattern at large spacing ratio were observed. The effects of Reynolds number and the centre-to-centre spacing ratio on flow patterns and turbulent characteristics were also investigated. It was found that the diameter ratio appears to have a certain effect on the flow patterns at intermediate spacing ratios, where the reattachment of shear layer depends on the lateral width of the wake flow in the lee of the upstream cylinder. Extensive discussion on the distributions of Reynolds stress and turbulent kinetic energy was presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据