4.6 Article

Molecular weight sensing properties of ionic liquid-polymer composite films: theory and experiment

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 2, 期 24, 页码 4867-4878

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3tc32528h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1243916]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Chemistry [1243916] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic liquids (ILs) are rapidly emerging as important coating materials for highly sensitive chemical sensing devices. In this regard, we have previously demonstrated that a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) coated with a binary mixture of an IL and cellulose acetate can be employed for detection and molecular weight estimation of organic vapors (J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 13732). Herein, we report follow-up studies aimed at formulating the theoretical basis for our previously observed relationship between molecular weight and changes in the QCM parameters. In the current work, we have investigated the vapor sensing characteristics of a series of binary blends of ILs and polymers over a wider concentration range of analytes, and a quadratic equation for estimating the approximate molecular weight of an organic vapor is proposed. Additionally, the frequency (f) and dissipation factor (D) at multiple harmonics were measured by use of a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D). These QCM-D data were then analyzed by fitting to various models. It is observed that the behavior of these films can be best described by use of the Maxwell viscoelastic model. In light of these observations, a plausible explanation for the correlation between the molecular weight of absorbed vapors and the QCM parameters is presented. Our previous findings appear to be a special case of this more general observation. Overall, these results underscore the true potential of IL-based composite materials for discrimination and molecular weight estimation of a broad range of chemical vapors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据