4.7 Article

High-resolution dynamically downscaled projections of precipitation in the mid and late 21st century over North America

期刊

EARTHS FUTURE
卷 3, 期 7, 页码 268-288

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015EF000304

关键词

high-resolution; dynamic downscaling; precipitation; projection; North America

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [RC-2242, DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study performs high-spatial-resolution (12km) Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations over a very large domain (7200kmx6180km, covering much of North America) to explore changes in mean and extreme precipitation in the mid and late 21st century under Representative Concentration Pathways 4.5 (RCP 4.5) and 8.5 (RCP 8.5). We evaluate WRF model performance for a historical simulation and future projections, applying the Community Climate System Model version 4 (CCSM4) as initial and boundary conditions with and without a bias correction. WRF simulations using boundary and initial conditions from both versions of CCSM4 show smaller biases versus evaluation data sets than does CCSM4 over western North America. WRF simulations also improve spatial details of precipitation over much of North America. However, driving the WRF with the bias-corrected CCSM4 does not always reduce the bias. WRF-projected changes in precipitation include decreasing intensity over the southwestern United States, increasing intensity over the eastern United Sates and most of Canada, and an increase in the number of days with heavy precipitation over much of North America. Projected precipitation changes are more evident in the late 21st century than the mid 21st century, and they are more evident under RCP 8.5 than under RCP 4.5 in the late 21st century. Uncertainties in the projected changes in precipitation due to different warming scenarios are non-negligible. Differences in summer precipitation changes between WRF and CCSM4 are significant over most of the United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据