4.6 Article

An orange iridium(III) complex with wide-bandwidth in electroluminescence for fabrication of high-quality white organic light-emitting diodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 1, 期 44, 页码 7371-7379

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3tc31365d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [20971020, 21303012, 21273030, 51203017, 21131001, 60937001]
  2. 973 Program [2009CB623605]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [12QNJJ012, 12SSXT135]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel iridium(III) (pbi)(2)Ir(biq) with a strong orange emission at 573 nm was synthesized, which showed a high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of 45% in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. The quantum chemical calculations together with the photophysical properties indicated that the transition incorporation of (MLCT)-M-3 (metal-to-ligand charge transfer), (LLCT)-L-3 (ligand-to-ligand charge transfer) mixed with (LC)-L-3 (ligand-centered (3)pi-pi*) characters contributed to the emission of (pbi)(2)Ir(biq). Cyclic voltammetry (CV), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were then performed to investigate its electrochemical and thermal properties for fabrication of electroluminescent devices. Interestingly, complex (pbi)(2)Ir(biq) exhibited wide-bandwidth in electroluminescence (EL) of its orange electroluminescent devices, which made it effectively available to fabricate high-quality two-element white organic light-emitting diodes (WOLEDs). The resultant WOLED possessed a high current efficiency (eta(c)) of 22.1 cd A(-1) and power efficiency (eta(p)) of 25.5 mu m W-1 with a high color rendering index (CRI) of 80. Especially, the WOLED retained a favorable hp of 10.9 mu m W-1 and hc of 16 cd A(-1) at a high luminance of 1000 cd m(-2). Moreover, it was worthwhile to note that this WOLED exhibited a qualified R9 of 13 and Duv of -0.0013, and these values together with the high CRI conformed to the required standard for lamp illumination of the ENERGY STAR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据