4.6 Article

New oxazoline- and thiazoline-containing heteroleptic iridium(III) complexes for highly-efficient phosphorescent organic light-emitting devices (PhOLEDs): colour tuning by varying the electroluminescence bandwidth

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 1, 期 41, 页码 6800-6806

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3tc31463d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [51203017, 21303012]
  2. Science and Technology Development Planning of Jilin Province [20100540]
  3. EPSRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new homologous phosphorescent iridium complexes, bis-(2-phenylpyridine)(2-(2'-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline)iridium(III) [(ppy)(2)Ir(thoz)] (1) and bis-(2-phenylpyridine)(2-(2'-hydroxyphenyl)-2-thiazoline)iridium(III) [(ppy)(2)Ir(thoz)] (2), have been obtained in good yields and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, cyclic voltammetry, photoluminescence and electroluminescence studies, and by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations. Using the two complexes, which differ only by the heteroatom (O or S) substitution at the same site in the ancillary ligand, as the emitter, doped in a 4,4'-bis(N-carbazolyl) biphenyl (CBP) host, gave phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes (PhOLEDs) with very efficient green and yellow emission, respectively. The turn-on voltages for both devices are low (3.5-3.7 V). The green-emitting (ppy)(2)Ir(oz) - based device has a maximum brightness of 61 560 cd m(-2) (at 16 V); maximum luminance efficiency of 66.2 cd A(-1), 17.1% external quantum efficiency, 54 lm W-1 power efficiency and CIE coordinates of (0.35, 0.61) at a brightness of 10 000 cd m(-2). For the yellow-emitting (ppy)(2)Ir(thoz)-based device with a wide full spectral width at half maximum (FWHM) of 110 nm, the corresponding values are 21 350 cd m(-2) (at 14.5 V); 27.0 cd A(-1), 8.5%, 18.0 lm W-1 and CIE coordinates of (0.46, 0.50). Colour tuning is primarily a consequence of the significantly wider emission bandwidth of complex 2 compared to complex 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据