4.6 Article

Multifunctional amines enable the formation of polyamide nanofilm composite ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes with modulated charge and performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 41, 页码 20242-20253

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta07841f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [EMR/2017/000251]
  2. CSIR, India
  3. DST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional thin film composite (TFC) nanofiltration (NF) membranes are positively or negatively charged with an active layer thickness of several nanometers depending on the preparation conditions. Low molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) ultrafiltration (UF) membranes obtained by the phase inversion process show low permeate flux due to the formation of a several micrometre thick skin layer. We have developed an extremely simple route to produce novel TFC NF (MCO similar to 180 Da) and UF (MWCO similar to 1 and 10 kDa) types of membranes with an active layer thickness in the range of 12-36 nm via supported interfacial polymerization using polyethyleneimine (PEI) as a monomer. The membrane charge, solute rejection, active layer thickness, and MWCO have been modulated by simple adjustment of diffusion of PEI towards the interfacial zone. TFC UF type of membranes were formed at PEI concentrations in the range of 0.01-0.03% w/v while NF membranes were formed at PEI concentrations in the range of 0.05-0.3% w/v. Our TFC NF membranes exhibited a permeate water flux of 19-24 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1) which is about 4-5 times higher than those of PEI-based membranes and 1.3-4 times higher than those of a few commercial NF membranes of similar MWCOs. The TFC UF membranes showed a permeate flux of ca. 48-69 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1), about 2-5 times higher than those of some UF membranes reported here. The process is scalable, and the membranes are useful for the separation of charge and neutral solutes with high efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据