4.4 Article

Discovery reach for generic supersymmetry at the LHC: MT2 versus missing transverse momentum selections for pMSSM searches

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2011)104

关键词

Supersymmetry Phenomenology

资金

  1. STFC
  2. STFC [ST/J000434/1, ST/H001026/2, ST/H001026/1, ST/G000581/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J000434/1, ST/G000581/1, ST/H001026/1, ST/H001026/2] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different search strategies for supersymmetry have been employed by the LHC general-purpose experiments using early data. As proven by their early results, these strategies are promising, but raise the question of how well they will generalize for the future. We address this question by studying two thousand phenomenological minimal supersymmetric standard model parameter space points that come from a fit to indirect and cosmological data. We examine the 5 sigma discoverability of the points employing a typical ATLAS-type search based on missing transverse momentum (MET), a search based on an optimised M-T2 cut and a combination of the two, taking into account standard model backgrounds. The discovery reach of the strategies can depend strongly on the systematic uncertainty in the background, subject to the stringency of the cuts and the details of the background simulation. By combining the MET and M-T2 based strategies, with an integrated luminosity of 1 fb(-1) (10 fb(-1)) at 7TeV, 4-8% (42%) of the points are discoverable, depending on the systematic uncertainty on the background. At 14TeV and with 10 fb-1, 96% of the points are discoverable. While the majority of points can be discovered by both strategies at root s = 14 TeV and with 1 fb(-1), there are some that are left undiscovered by a MET search strategy, but which are discovered by the M-T2 strategy, and vice versa, therefore it is essential that one performs both in parallel. We discuss some of the factors that can make points more difficult to observe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据