4.4 Article

Genome-wide analysis of the diatom cell cycle unveils a novel type of cyclins involved in environmental signaling

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r17

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ghent University [12050398]
  2. European Union [LSHG-CT-2004-512035, GOCE-CT-2004-505403]
  3. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT)
  4. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite the enormous importance of diatoms in aquatic ecosystems and their broad industrial potential, little is known about their life cycle control. Diatoms typically inhabit rapidly changing and unstable environments, suggesting that cell cycle regulation in diatoms must have evolved to adequately integrate various environmental signals. The recent genome sequencing of Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum allows us to explore the molecular conservation of cell cycle regulation in diatoms. Results: By profile-based annotation of cell cycle genes, counterparts of conserved as well as new regulators were identified in T. pseudonana and P. tricornutum. In particular, the cyclin gene family was found to be expanded extensively compared to that of other eukaryotes and a novel type of cyclins was discovered, the diatom-specific cyclins. We established a synchronization method for P. tricornutum that enabled assignment of the different annotated genes to specific cell cycle phase transitions. The diatom-specific cyclins are predominantly expressed at the G1-to-S transition and some respond to phosphate availability, hinting at a role in connecting cell division to environmental stimuli. Conclusion: The discovery of highly conserved and new cell cycle regulators suggests the evolution of unique control mechanisms for diatom cell division, probably contributing to their ability to adapt and survive under highly fluctuating environmental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据